<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Nokia E75: A tangible step up from the E71 but it&#8217;s marred by quality problems</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.theprodigalguide.com/2009/04/29/nokia-e75-first-impressions/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.theprodigalguide.com/2009/04/29/nokia-e75-first-impressions/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=nokia-e75-first-impressions</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2012 20:08:13 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: An open letter to Nokia CEO, Olli-Pekka Kallasvuo: The 10 things you need to do today to be a contender in the high-end smartphone market again &#171; The Prodigal Guide</title>
		<link>http://www.theprodigalguide.com/2009/04/29/nokia-e75-first-impressions/#comment-3099</link>
		<dc:creator>An open letter to Nokia CEO, Olli-Pekka Kallasvuo: The 10 things you need to do today to be a contender in the high-end smartphone market again &#171; The Prodigal Guide</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Jan 2010 09:16:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theprodigalguide.com/?p=1036#comment-3099</guid>
		<description>[...] as better than an iPhone. And our old 8800 Scirocco still gets palm time even now. More recently, the E75 and N97 mini have both impressed – albeit with caveats. And we continue to use our trusty N86 [...] </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] as better than an iPhone. And our old 8800 Scirocco still gets palm time even now. More recently, the E75 and N97 mini have both impressed – albeit with caveats. And we continue to use our trusty N86 [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: A Prodigal October &#171; The Prodigal Guide</title>
		<link>http://www.theprodigalguide.com/2009/04/29/nokia-e75-first-impressions/#comment-3098</link>
		<dc:creator>A Prodigal October &#171; The Prodigal Guide</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Nov 2009 14:03:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theprodigalguide.com/?p=1036#comment-3098</guid>
		<description>[...] number 3 &#8211; Nokia E75: A tangible step up from the E71 but it’s marred by quality problems &#8211; Our review of Nokia&#8217;s slider-QWERTY business [...] </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] number 3 &#8211; Nokia E75: A tangible step up from the E71 but it’s marred by quality problems &#8211; Our review of Nokia&#8217;s slider-QWERTY business [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Prodigal Fool</title>
		<link>http://www.theprodigalguide.com/2009/04/29/nokia-e75-first-impressions/#comment-3097</link>
		<dc:creator>The Prodigal Fool</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Aug 2009 20:27:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theprodigalguide.com/?p=1036#comment-3097</guid>
		<description>Just to conclude the story about our &#039;faulty&#039; E75. We did finally replace our unit but...

The replacement had even worse problems than the original: one of the keys on the QWERTY keyboard lacks tactile feedback. So, although it registers key presses, you don&#039;t think you have hit it and therefore hit it again. Very irritating.

Problem number 2: with the slider open, there is a very definite wobble of the upper section. Not nice.

So, it seems the quality problems we found on our first unit were just the tip of an iceberg. To us at least, these sorts of issues are completely unacceptable in a device in this price range from a supposedly reputable manufacturer. Nokia, you urgently need to sort this out. Meanwhile, we&#039;re very happy with our Apple iPhone 3GS...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just to conclude the story about our &#8216;faulty&#8217; E75. We did finally replace our unit but&#8230;</p>
<p>The replacement had even worse problems than the original: one of the keys on the QWERTY keyboard lacks tactile feedback. So, although it registers key presses, you don&#8217;t think you have hit it and therefore hit it again. Very irritating.</p>
<p>Problem number 2: with the slider open, there is a very definite wobble of the upper section. Not nice.</p>
<p>So, it seems the quality problems we found on our first unit were just the tip of an iceberg. To us at least, these sorts of issues are completely unacceptable in a device in this price range from a supposedly reputable manufacturer. Nokia, you urgently need to sort this out. Meanwhile, we&#8217;re very happy with our Apple iPhone 3GS&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Prodigal Fool</title>
		<link>http://www.theprodigalguide.com/2009/04/29/nokia-e75-first-impressions/#comment-3096</link>
		<dc:creator>The Prodigal Fool</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Jun 2009 07:59:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theprodigalguide.com/?p=1036#comment-3096</guid>
		<description>Hi Gareth

We haven&#039;t done any technical tests but - to our ears - listening through Nokia’s own WH-700 headphones, yes the sound quality of MP3s is slightly better. It&#039;s a very small difference though and we may well be imagining it but the bass sounds meatier and the treble more precise. As I say though, the difference is almost imperceptible. If you&#039;re looking for a dramatic improvement in sound quality, I&#039;m afraid you&#039;ll be disappointed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Gareth</p>
<p>We haven&#8217;t done any technical tests but &#8211; to our ears &#8211; listening through Nokia’s own WH-700 headphones, yes the sound quality of MP3s is slightly better. It&#8217;s a very small difference though and we may well be imagining it but the bass sounds meatier and the treble more precise. As I say though, the difference is almost imperceptible. If you&#8217;re looking for a dramatic improvement in sound quality, I&#8217;m afraid you&#8217;ll be disappointed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: gareth</title>
		<link>http://www.theprodigalguide.com/2009/04/29/nokia-e75-first-impressions/#comment-3095</link>
		<dc:creator>gareth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Jun 2009 22:38:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theprodigalguide.com/?p=1036#comment-3095</guid>
		<description>Hi 
I was interested in your E75 article, good stuff.  Would you say that the mp3 audio quality is better than the E71? I find the E71 ok but not as good as the Noikia 5800.  Would be interested in your views.

Thanks
Gareth</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi<br />
I was interested in your E75 article, good stuff.  Would you say that the mp3 audio quality is better than the E71? I find the E71 ok but not as good as the Noikia 5800.  Would be interested in your views.</p>
<p>Thanks<br />
Gareth</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

