Opinion: The pull of a particular Omega Speedmaster
By Straight-Six, published on 27 January 2010
But when the Fool laid out a very modest sum for a no-crown guards, straight lugged pre-moon Speedmaster several years ago, I appreciated, rather than enthused over, his purchase. It was in immaculate condition, the price was right and the stars were in alignment over this being a terrific investment. He has since put a delightful strap on it and I’ve occasionally glimpsed it on his wrist.
But, we all know that looks often override other concerns when it comes to the finer things in life. And the Omega Speedmaster is no exception – particularly the vintage models. Simply put, I found the dial to be insipid and without the depth and brilliance I so crave in a timepiece. Forget the Man on the Moon; I wanted more celestial sparkle from the Speedmaster’s face.
Where many vintage Speedmasters employ straight and bright white hands, the Omega Speedmaster CK2998 featured here has polished “dauphine” hands that have utterly seduced us.
Seduced by watch hands? Yes, folks. I didn’t believe it was possible, but a change in hands transformed the watch completely. And the contrast between the warm gray of the faded dial and the dauphine delights is a treat. The hunt is now on for a good one.
“Fly me to the moon, let me play among the stars…”
Opinion: The pull of a particular Omega Speedmaster
I have long battled with The Prodigal Fool about the merits and appeal of Omega’s vintage Speedmaster. The historical significance and pedigree of the only watch to have ever gone to the moon and back (before being lost in the US mail, if you can believe it…) is beyond question, as is its functionality and very [...]
This section is supported by the patronage of:
